Use
of Laser in Controlling the Growth of Facial Structures, "Laser-Orthopedics"
This
was an endeavor to use a laser to control the development of facial structures,
especially the condyle and the mandible. The aim of the study was to investigate
the potential use of a laser for treating patients whose facial structures
are predisposed to deviation in growth and development much
as chin-cups, face-masks and headgear are used. Laser treatment might, one
day, be an additional method for controlling the development of these facial
structures.
Three
groups of three hamsters were established:
The
long term study over seven months showed slower lower jaw growth in both Groups
B and C, relative to group A. The
importance of these findings is the implied possibility of laser use in the
future to modify the growth and development of facial structures in humans.
In
Vitro, Chin-cup, diode laser, Laser-Orthodontic Therapy.
INTRODUCTION:
Orthodontics
is one of the important domains with interests in human growth and development.
Nine
hamsters of the same age were used in this study. They were
divided into three groups for comparison.
This force has been demonstrated to be efficient in hindering or slowing the
normal growth of the lower jaw11.
In
all nine animals, the length of lower jaws were measured in monthly intervals
to compare the efficiency of each method on both groups "B" and
"C".
The
Influence of Laser on growth
Unfortunately,
the contemporary usage of laser is still often "ablative".
To
understand the normal growth in facial structures, it's desirable to study
the Condyle Cartilage strata.
The
Condyle Cartilage strata are:
According
to chin-cup studies12
the influence of chin-cup happens on the aspect of Prechondroblasts
stratum.
However,
the influence of low laser energy laser is slightly different as it mainly
happens on the so-called zone of growth and zone of maturation, or in other
words the prechondroblasts, cartilaginous matrix,
hypertrophied chondroblasts, and the calcified cartilaginous
matrix.

The
fibrous capsule, the prechondroblasts, and skeletoblasts
form the so-called Zone of Growth.

Fig2.
Strata of the mandibular condyle.
RESULTS:
In
this experiment, Group B, where the chin-cup had been used for seven months,
the greatest retardation in mandibular growth was in the beginning of the
experiment, with the
highest percentage of delay in jaw growth in the first month (42%).
In
contrast to Group B, Group C (the three hamsters treated with low energy laser)
had the most delay in growth in the seventh month. The values of delay in
growth had been minimal in the first month (5)%, but, gradually , the growth
was reduced to approximately 20% relative to Group A on the final days of
the seventh month. (P<0.05)
Group
C does not exhibit an "onslaught" effect.
The
advantage of the laser technique in Group C was apparent in its ability to
retard mandibular growth in the hamster. Growth restriction increased continuously
from 5% in the first month to about 20% in the final steps of the experiment.
TABLE
1. The Average of Changes of values of growth: "in groups B and C"
relatively to A per month. SD means here the Standard deviation.
|
Months |
Group
B "Chin-Cup" AC SD |
Group C "low energy laser" AC SD |
||
|
1 |
42 |
0.084 |
5 |
0.011 |
|
2 |
25 |
0.069 |
7 |
0.013 |
|
3 |
22 |
0.047 |
9 |
0.014 |
|
4 |
25 |
0.036 |
13 |
0.012 |
|
5 |
20 |
0.026 |
15 |
0.016 |
|
6 |
13 |
0.061 |
17 |
0.025 |
|
7 |
8 |
0.064 |
20 |
0.022 |
DISCUSSION:
This
experiment illustrates a potential substitution to chin-cup therapy in the
future.
Therefore, for laser to be used in non-ablative
therapies, it is paramount that acceptable thresholds be established to allow
its therapeutic use without the risk of destructive or necrotic changes.
The mechanism of laser energy influence on the tissue strata is still somewhat
vague. It will be important to find the possible "receptors" or
the tissues of higher "response". If this could be established it
would be of great value in establishing a therapeutic laser technique.
Conclusion:
This
experiment demonstrates the use of the laser in regulating facial growth and
its potential as a substitute for current conventional methods such as a chin-cup
References:
|
1. Ackerman JL: The Challenge of Adult orthodontics,
J Clin Orthal
2.Ackerman JL, Proffit WR: Soft tissue limitation in orthodontics diagnosis and
treatment planning. Clin Orthod 67:327-336,1997. 3.Allardice
JT, Abulafi AM, Grahn
MF, Williams NS: Adjuvant intraoperative
photodymanic therapy for colorectal carcinoma: A clinical
study. Surg Oncol
1994, 3:1-9. 4. American Association of Orthodontics: Study of the
availability of Orthodontic Services, AM J Orthod
68:326, 1975. 5.Arnocsky
SP, Aksan A. Thermal modification of connective
tissue, Basic Science consideration and clinical impressions. J Am
Acad Orthop Surg
2000; 8:305-310. 6.De Vries N, Van der Waal I, Snow GB: Multiple primary tumors in oral cancer. Int J Oral
Maxillofac Surg
1986; 15:85-87. 7.Dilkes
MG, Mc Gillian JA. Adjunctive intraoperative
photodynamic therapy and microvascular anastomoses.Arch Otolaryngol Head
Neck Surg 1997; 123:888. 8.Drelich
RC: A cephalometric study of untreated class II division I malocclusion. Angle Orthod 21:44-56, 1948. 9.Graber
LW. Chin-cup therapy for mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod 72:23-41, 1977. 10. Graber LW. Psycho-social implication
of dentofacial appearance. Doctoral Dissertation, 11. Graber TM: Extra-oral force facts-fallacies, Am J
Orthod 41:490-505, 1955. 12. Graber TM: Orthodontics, principles and practices,
13.Graber TM: Personal communication,
1975. 14. Graber TM: Extrinsic control factors controlling
facial growth, 1976, Center for Human Growth and developments. Graber TM, Chung DD, Aoba JT: Dentofacial
orthopedic versus orthodontics, Am Dent Association 75:1145-1166,
1967. 15. Hicks MJ, Flaitz CM, Westernman GH,Blankenau
RJ, Powell GL, Berg JH. Enamel caries initiation and Progression following
Low Energy Argon Laser.JClin Dent 1995;20(1):9-13 16.Jost-Brinkman PG, Stien
H et al: Histological investigation of the human pulp after thermodebonding of metal and ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod 102:410,1992 17. Kharsa M A. Comparison among Fixed and Removable
Appliances in Fulfilling Orthodontic Movements. Doctoral Dissertation, 18. Kuhn RJ. Control of extra-oral
dimension and proper selection of extra-oral anchorage. Angle Orthod 38:341,1986. 19.Luder HU, Effects of activator
treatment- Evidence of the occurrence of two different types of reaction, Eur,
J Orthod 3:205, 1981. 20. Mc Namara JA Jr. Neuro-muscular and skeletal adaptation to altered orofacial function. Monograph
1, Craniofacial series, 21. Mc Namara JA Jr. Neuro-muscular and skeletal adaptation to altered function
in the orofacial region. Am J Orthod
64:578, 1973. 22. Wolgin M, Finkenberg J, Papaioannou T et al,
Excimer ablation of human intervertebral
disc at 308 nanometers. Laser Surg Med 1989;
9:124-131. |
| Dr.
Mhd. Azhar Kharsa |
|
Dr
.Azhar Kharsa Tel/Facsimile:
(+ 963 11) 2127375 |